Responding to Review Comments

http://www.sfedit.net/reviewers.pdf

1. Read all of the comments fromreviewers and the editor.

2. Never respond immediately. Allow yourself a few days to reflect on the comments.

3. If the comments from the editor and reviewers can be used to improve your manuscript, by all means, make those changes.

5. If your manuscript has been provisionally accepted, it is a good idea to respond promptly. As soon as possible, begin drafting a polite, thoughtful, clear, and detailed response.

6. Be polite. Avoid a defensive or confrontational tone in your response. The goal is to extract helpful information fromthe comments, adopt any useful suggestions to improve your manuscript, and calmly explain your point of view when you disagree.

7. Respond completely to each comment in an orderly, itemized manner, and, if necessary, copy and paste into the letter any substantive changes made to the manuscript. There is no limit on the length of your response. Most editors are willing to read a long and complete response.

8. Change and modify your manuscript where it makes sense. You are not required to make every suggested change, but you do need to address all of the comments. If you reject a suggestion, the editor will want a good reason with evidence supported by references. Just because you prefer it your way is not a good enough reason.

Photosynth and Trials

Websites

• Official homepage: http://photosynth.net/ (liveID: dywon0103@gmail.com)
• Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynth
• Official University of Washington Photo Tourism Site: http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/
• Structure from motion code (Bundler): http://phototour.cs.washington.edu/bundler/

References

[1] Noah Snavely, Steven M. Seitz, Richard Szeliski, "Photo tourism: Exploring photo collections in 3D," ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), 25(3), 2006, 835-846.
[2] Noah Snavely, Steven M. Seitz, Richard Szeliski, "Modeling the world from Internet photo collections," International Journal of Computer Vision (to be published).

First Trial

- Name: Marulan Container Box

- Images: 26 files (6.03MB each)

- Computation time: about 24 min.

- 82% Synthy

2D images

3D View

Overhead

Point Cloud

Guidelines for Expanding Conference Papers for Submission to the IEEE Sensors Journal

Ref:  http://ewh.ieee.org/tc/sensors/SJ/SJExpandedConfPapers.pdf

General Guidelines
 

Mandatory Actions:

• If changes are made, choose a new title for the paper.
• Use feedback obtained at the conference to update, revise, and rewrite the
  paper as appropriate to improve its overall quality.
• Reference your conference paper in the appropriate locations.
• Include a footnote in the submitted manuscript stating, e.g., "An earlier version
  of this paper was presented at the 20XX IEEE SENSORS Conference and was
  published in its proceedings."
• Indicate in a letter (upload as a supporting document during the submission
  process) whether the conference paper was peer-reviewed and clearly state
  what has been changed.
• Provide the original conference paper (upload a PDF file during the submission
  process).
• If IEEE does not hold the copyright for your conference paper, obtain
  permission to reprint figures and tables that are used in the expanded paper.

Recommended Actions:

• Expand the background section and include additional references.
• Include novel scientific content and expanded descriptions of procedures.
• Provide data that was not published at the conference.
• Revise and update figures and text to avoid exact duplication of the conference proceedings.